Archive for the ‘Women’ category

Stop The Ignorant PC Madness-SHE is a WOMAN

July 4, 2008

Stop The Ignorant PC Madness-SHE is a WOMAN

“[T]he transgender”…”who made headlines as the so-called “pregnant man,” gave birth Sunday to a healthy baby girl…” abcnews.go.com

STOP the politically correct madness! This is a WOMAN, not a Man.

“Born a woman”, {SHE had HER} “breasts surgically removed and legally changed” {HER} “gender from female to male…” “[T]aking hormones and living outwardly as a man…[SHE]”maintained that” {SHE} “retained” [HER] “female sex organs because” [SHE] “intended one day to get pregnant”. (Parentheses and emphasis added)

She has a right to have a baby, because SHE IS A WOMEN!

Now the non-politically correct TRUTH of the matter:

Romans Chapter 1:

13: “Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

14: I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.

15: So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.

16: For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

17: For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

18: For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19: Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

20: For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

21: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

22: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

23: And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

24: Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

25: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

26: For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28: And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29: Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30: Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31: Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.” (Emphasis added)

Spiritually, she is dead having a reprobate mind. “God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient”. It is not too late. Don’t be ignorant! Stop The Ignorant PC Madness.

Hillary Clinton: Statement of Pure Evil—“A Woman’s Right to Choose…”

April 18, 2007

Hillary Clinton: Statement of Pure Evil—“A Woman’s Right to Choose…”

4/18/2007-Hillary Clinton: From the Senate: Statement on Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. Carhart Decision; Washington, DC — “This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman’s right to choose and recognized the importance of women’s health. Today’s decision blatantly defies the Court’s recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.” http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1451

A Statement of Pure Evil—A Woman’s Right to Choose (to Kill their Baby)—addition added by this writer.

This is pure evil; how can a mother say that the rights and lives of women must be taken into account over the partial-birth abortion of a baby? What about the rights of fathers? Partial-birth abortion is one of the most evil and barbaric voluntary acts committed by humans.

[See excerpts quoted below from the Supreme Court Decision-and you be the judge]

Erosion of what constitutional rights?—you do not have a constitutional right to kill your baby? Maybe Hillary Clinton can show us where in the U.S Constitution it gives women the right to kill their baby.

Just because, in the past, there was an evil decision made by fallible Supreme Court Judges (mere men and women) does not mean that the U.S Constitution gives women the right to kill their baby.

Hillary Clinton, and any other human being, must have a “conscience seared with a hot iron” to really believe that killing a baby by choice is a constitutional right. This is merely “lies in hypocrisy” by a liberal politician seeking power.

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;” “Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” (1Timothy 4:1-2)

Now, you be the judge!

The following statements are quotes from the Supreme Court Decision: Gonzales v. Carhart; No. 05-380 April 18, 2007

Decision Excerpts: Abortion Methods

“Abortion methods vary depending to some extent on the preferences of the physician and, of course, on the term of the pregnancy and the resulting stage of the unborn child’s development. Between 85 and 90 percent of the approximately 1.3 million abortions performed each year in the United States take place in the first three months of pregnancy, which is to say in the first trimester.”

“The most common first-trimester abortion method is vacuum aspiration (otherwise known as suction curettage) in which the physician vacuums out the embryonic tissue. Early in this trimester an alternative is to use medication, such as mifepristone (commonly known as RU-486), to terminate the pregnancy.”

“Of the remaining abortions that take place each year, most occur in the second trimester. The surgical procedure referred to as “dilation and evacuation” or “D&E” is the usual abortion method in this trimester.”

“A doctor must first dilate the cervix at least to the extent needed to insert surgical instruments into the uterus and to maneuver them to evacuate the fetus.”

“The resulting amount of dilation is not uniform, and a doctor does not know in advance how an individual patient will respond. In general the longer dilators remain in the cervix, the more it will dilate. Yet the length of time doctors employ osmotic dilators varies. Some may keep dilators in the cervix for two days, while others use dilators for a day or less.”

“After sufficient dilation the surgical operation can commence. The woman is placed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. The doctor, often guided by ultrasound, inserts grasping forceps through the woman’s cervix and into the uterus to grab the fetus. The doctor grips a fetal part with the forceps and pulls it back through the cervix and vagina, continuing to pull even after meeting resistance from the cervix. The friction causes the fetus to tear apart. For example, a leg might be ripped off the fetus as it is pulled through the cervix and out of the woman. The process of evacuating the fetus piece by piece continues until it has been completely removed. A doctor may make 10 to 15 passes with the forceps to evacuate the fetus in its entirety, though sometimes removal is completed with fewer passes. Once the fetus has been evacuated, the placenta and any remaining fetal material are suctioned or scraped out of the uterus. The doctor examines the different parts to ensure the entire fetal body has been removed.”

“Some doctors, especially later in the second trimester, may kill the fetus a day or two before performing the surgical evacuation. They inject digoxin or potassium chloride into the fetus, the umbilical cord, or the amniotic fluid. Fetal demise may cause contractions and make greater dilation possible. Once dead, moreover, the fetus’ body will soften, and its removal will be easier. Other doctors refrain from injecting chemical agents, believing it adds risk with little or no medical benefit.” http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/

You be the judge!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The California No Spanking/Abortion Hypocrisy

January 22, 2007

The California No Spanking/Abortion Hypocrisy

Assemblywoman Sally Lieber, D-Mountain View, recently announced that she is drafting a bill to outlaw the spanking of children up to 3 years old. Reportedly according to the Mercury News, “[f]or the record, she does not have children and says she was not slapped as a child.” Now if we applied the Senator Barbara Boxer’s “Rice Standard”, Assemblywoman Lieber is not qualified to draft a bill which deals with children.

But what is so outrageous, is that this is, at least, contradictory and at worst overt and blatant hypocrisy. According to the Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California’s (PPAC’s) 2006 Legislative score card, Assemblywoman Sally Lieber is “100% pro-choice”*. The main emphasis of the advocates of Roe v. Wade is “pro-choice” or more accurately, pro-abortion, let’s be frank.

It is blatant hypocrisy, that the very same so-called “pro-choice” liberal mindset ignores the premeditated murdering of babies, but will dictate no choice to parents when it comes to spanking.

What about a woman’s right to choose? What about a parent’s right to choose? Women have the right to murder a baby, but no right to spank the same child they could have murdered in the womb; how absurd is this.

It is overt and blatant hypocrisy that the very same liberal mindset ignores their own logic, only to pursue their morally destructive policies, for “we the people”.

By the way, we are not talking about beating—no hypocritical clouding of the real issue.

And just for the record, in general, this writer is not advocating the spanking of children under three. The issue of spanking may be discussed in more detail at a later time.

*Reference: http://www.ppacca.org/site/pp.asp?c=kuJYJeO4F&b=139441

The 34 Year Anniversary of Roe v. Wade

January 20, 2007

The 34 Year Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
January 22, 1973-January 22, 2006

Happy Anniversary America?

What an Anniversary! 1,477,591 Million Abortions Each Year in America
*“United States Abortion Statistics: 47,282,923 Abortions 1973-2005
Reported abortions in the United States, by year 1973 – 2005
–One baby is aborted every 24 seconds
–147 babies are aborted every hour
–3,542 babies are aborted every day
— 24,865 babies are aborted every week
–107,750 babies are aborted every month”
*Reference: http://www.mccl.org/abortion_statistics.htm

Why is America Allowing Premeditated Murder of Innocent Babies? When; *“Americans’ views concerning abortion are:
–73% say abortion should be legal only in some circumstances (53%), or illegal in all circumstances (20%). Harris Interactive, April 2006
–88% favor a law requiring doctors to inform patients about alternatives to abortion. CNN/USA Today / Gallup Poll, January 2003
–78% agree that women who have abortions experience emotional trauma, such as grief and regret. Wirthlin Poll, 1998
–74% believe that abortion should be illegal “when the woman does not want the child for any reason.” Gallup Poll, May 2003”
*Reference: http://www.mccl.org/abortion_statistics.htm

The Answer: The U.S. Supreme Court!
ROE v. WADE, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court
410 U.S. 113 Roe Et Al. V. Wade, District Attorney Of Dallas County
Appeal From The United States District Court For The Northern District Of Texas No. 70-18.
Argued December 13, 1971 Reargued October 11, 1972
Decided January 22, 1973
Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights

*“Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)[1], is a landmark judicial opinion regarding abortion in the United States. According to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe decision, most laws against abortion violate a constitutional right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision overturned all state and federal laws outlawing or restricting abortion that were inconsistent with its holdings. It is one of the most controversial and politically significant cases in U.S. Supreme Court history, and its lesser-known companion case was decided at the same time: Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973).[2]

The central holding of Roe v. Wade was that abortions are permissible for any reason a woman chooses, up until the “point at which the fetus becomes ‘viable,’ that is, potentially able to live outside the mother’s womb, albeit with artificial aid. Viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks.”[3] The decision prompted national debate that continues to this day over whether terminating pregnancies should be legal (or more precisely, whether a state can choose to deem the act illegal), the role of the Supreme Court in constitutional adjudication, and the role of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the nation into “pro-choice” and “pro-life” camps, and inspiring grassroots activism on both sides.”
*Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade

Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment XIV (in part)
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Happy Anniversary America?!