Archive for the ‘Immigration’ category

Citizen or Not

December 24, 2007

Citizen or Not

Are you a Citizen or not? That is what life comes down to in the United States of America.

According to a news story, “Police in suburban Scottsdale have begun routinely asking for proof of citizenship from every suspect they arrest and turning those who are in this country illegally over to federal immigration officials.” apnews.myway.com/article/[Note Correction; www.foxnews.com/] [If they are in the country illegally-not a citizen]

Are you a Citizen or not?

The basic reasons for why the U.S. Constitution was formed has been and is being marginalized, in some cases, by mere ignorance or of little concern and, in other cases, intentional subversion by what this writer will boldly refer to as treasonous internationalists.

“Just as the Bible with its basic doctrinal definitives, identifies who and what a Christian is, our national Constitution with its Bill of Rights identify who is a U.S. citizen and guarantees what each citizen’s rights are. Just as the liberal church theologians now try to eliminate the word “doctrine” from the Bible, the one-world internationalists are eliminating the Bill of Rights, if not the entire constitutional structure.

Most citizens do not seem to care that our Constitution is being eliminated and replaced by presidential directives and court decisions.” (Noah Hutchings, www.swrc.com)

The Preamble to the Constitution gives the general reasons for its establishment:

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

www.instituteontheconstitution.com/

The basic fabric of this Constitution is about “We the People” or in other words we the Citizens of the United States of America. It’s about being a Citizen or not. The existence of this Constitution is about people who are citizens of this governmental entity ordained by GOD.

What does the U.S. Constitution have to say about being a citizen or not?

The Constitution of the United States; Amendment XIV

“Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

For purposes as identified by the Constitution of the United States, persons are citizens. Specifically, the word “persons” as defined here are the “citizens” of the United States.

Thus the constitutional definition of the term “citizens” as used here is: “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

Let’s read this Section with more understanding as to who is a citizen or not.

Section one says; All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person [meaning any citizen] of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person [meaning any citizen] within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [This writer’s emphasis and comments added]

A U.S. Citizen is essentially, one who has “privileges” and “immunities” and shall not be deprived of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” or “the equal protection of the laws”.

Conversely, non-citizens or illegal aliens do not have “privileges” and “immunities” and can be deprived of living their life within the borders of the United States, and having liberty, or property within the borders of the United States, without due process of law or the equal protection of the laws.

Simply put, an illegal alien is not a citizen and thus have no “privileges” and “immunities”; although non-citizens (illegal aliens) are and should be allowed due process of law.

However, since the government have allowed non-citizens (or illegal aliens) “privileges” and “immunities”, non-citizens and certain groups (such as the ACLU, the main stream media and other socialists) now believe that they (non-citizens) have rights never constitutionally given—which is, as this writer believes, is the core reason that the non-citizenship (illegal alien) problem persists.

As a citizen you should know your basic Bill of Rights; “privileges” and “immunities”.
www.instituteontheconstitution.com/BillofRts

It is interesting to note that July 4, 2008 will be 232 years since The Declaration of Independence. As Citizens it would be good to read and take note of the words of this great Declaration, which in part reads:

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes;…But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

www.instituteontheconstitution.com/DecofIndpend

In 1776 this Country was at a crossroad and decided to turn in the right direction. We again, are at another crossroad of our Sovereignty as a Nation—which way will we turn this time?

Do we take our Citizenship for granted? The Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines Citizen as, in part:

“The native of a city, or an inhabitant who enjoys the freedom and privileges of the city in which he resides; the freeman of a city, as distinguished from a foreigner, or one not entitled to its franchises.”

“In the United States, a person, native or naturalized, who has the privilege of exercising the elective franchise, or the qualifications which enable him to vote for rulers, and to purchase and hold real estate.

If the citizens of the United States should not be free and happy, the fault will be entirely their own.”— Noah Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

“If the citizens of the United States should not be free and happy, the fault will be entirely their own.” “…For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.” (Romans 13:1) and, “…We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 2:29)

It’s About the U.S. Constitution, Citizens! It’s about being a Citizen or not.

After having said all this, in the end it’s really about citizenship in the Kingdom of GOD, it’s about our LORD JESUS CHRIST.

Copyright © 2007 WorldViewPoints

Advertisements

One More Step Closer To The New World Order (NWO)

September 9, 2007

One More Step Closer To The New World Order (NWO)

Are You Still Sleeping? Wake up USA our right to life, liberty and property is at stake!

We are one more step closer to the “New World Order Government” (NWOG):
www.alipac.us/
www.alipac.us/
www.worldnetdaily.com/
www.worldnetdaily.com/

Who is Robert Pastor? His goal is to give away U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union. www.humanevents.com/

If you have read the information above, you can more clearly see that we are one more step closer to the “New World Order Government” (NWOG); the governmental establishment so secretly planned ages ago.

Are you still sleeping? Wake up citizens and legal immigrants of the once sovereign United States of America.

We The People” of this once great Republic have fallen asleep and have allowed the treasonous political/socialist elite, economic/socialist elite and religious/socialist elite to progressively subvert and hijack the Constitution of the United States of America!

This “New World Order Government” (NWOG) planned by the Elite will dramatically alter this Republic of our forefathers, as was graciously allowed by the One and only True GOD, our SAVIOUR and LORD JESUS CHRIST. [To be clear, this is not referencing some allah or any other idol/man-made god!].

“Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God:”
“But he that denieth me before men shall be denied before the angels of God.”
“And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven.”
“And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say:”
“For the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what ye ought to say.”
(Luke 12:8-12)

“Our founding fathers gave us a republic, which is a rule by law. The law was to protect the individual. The republic was simply a collective force of individuals to protect the individual’s right to life, liberty and property. Our founding fathers gave us a republic because they knew very well that a democracy was simply a temporary and transitional form of government on the way to totalitarian government. Those founding fathers were freedom-loving people who wanted to avoid all forms of state monopoly such as communism, nazism, fascism and even socialism.”—Larry Bates, “The New Economic Disorder”, page 98.

“Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?” (Romans 6:16)
“Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)
“For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?” (1Peter 4:17)

The time is come, the last days are here, so judgment must begin at the house of God—that is, the people of GOD, the family of GOD, in other words, judgment must begin with Christians—Wake Up USA, our right to life, liberty and property is at stake!

“Iraqi terrorists caught along Mexico border?”…Well, Then, Close The Borders

August 23, 2007

“Iraqi terrorists caught along Mexico border?”…Well, Then, Close The Borders

“President Bush’s top intelligence aide has confirmed that Iraqi terrorists have been captured coming into the United States from Mexico.” worldnetdaily.com/news/article
“The goal, McConnell said, is for terrorists to gain admittance to the United States, and then produce “mass casualties.”

Well, then, ClOSE THE BORDERS–this is not “rocket science”, President!.

How stupid can our leaders be? Or is this just another case of hypocrisy by U.S. Government leaders?

Barack Obama— A Victory for All Americans? What?

July 29, 2007

Barack Obama— A Victory for All Americans? What?
Maybe the Senator meant to say, it was a victory for all illegal aliens. Unfortunately, those are the words of just another “Washington wanna-be”, a “WWB”, who is a hypocrite.

(Hypocrisy is the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion, being hypocritical is with a false appearance of what is good; a hypocrite is an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.)

The WorldNetDaily.com reports that, “[T]he presidential hopeful praised the recent court decision overturning one city’s attempt to protect itself from hostile foreigners filling their streets with drugs, crime and gangs as “a victory for all Americans.”” www.worldnetdaily.com/news/

In his own divisive comment, Senator Obama suggests that this is a victory for all Americans! He wants to be the President of the United States, but does not allow local communities to act in their best interest and thus the best “interests of our national and economic security”.

Now, in his own divisive, exploitive and hypocritical quote from barackobama.com: “Barack Obama believes the immigration issue has been exploited by politicians to divide the nation rather than find real solutions. This divisiveness has allowed the illegal immigration problem to worsen, with borders that are less secure than ever and an economy that depends on millions of workers living in the shadows. Obama believes we must rise above divisive politics and act in the interests of our national and economic security. Obama has played a leading role in crafting comprehensive immigration reform and believes that our broken immigration system can only be fixed by putting politics aside and offering a solution that strengthens our security while reaffirming our heritage as a nation of immigrants.” www.barackobama.com/issues/

“Some of the most violent criminals at large today are illegal aliens. Yet in cities where the crime these aliens commit is highest, the police cannot use the most obvious tool to apprehend them: their immigration status.” “Sanctuary laws are a testament to the political power of immigrant lobbies.” www.cis.org/articles/

That report was as of 2004, how much worst are things now? How many more lives have been lost because of politically correct self-serving politicians like Senator Obama (a so called Christian)?

What about this Senator Obama? “MS-13 is attempting to become a unified criminal enterprise operating under one leadership.” “The Washington Times has obtained a copy of the letter and an Army intelligence presentation on the growth of MS-13, or Mara Salvatrucha.” http://washingtontimes.com/

Or, Senator Obama, what about this then? “Using the GAO report, Representative Steve King of Iowa points out that 25 Americans, on average, are killed by illegal aliens every day (about evenly split between motor vehicle accidents and outright murder).”
“Do the math: That works out to more than 9,000 deaths per year, or more than 36,000 deaths over the past four years. That’s more than ten times the number of Americans killed in Iraq over the past four years!” “Oddly, I’ve seen people in my hometown protesting against the war in Iraq, but I’ve never seen anyone protesting against the illegal alien invasion that is killing tens of thousands of Americans right here on our own soil.” www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/

Or, Senator Obama, you may need an education, so try this. “The Statue of Liberty is a monument dedicated to freedom and liberty. She never meant that foreigners have the right to violate America’s immigration laws.” “Calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a burglar an uninvited house guest.” www.illegalaliens.us/

And Senator Obama wants to be the Chief Law enforcement executive for the United States of America? Sorry Senator Obama, other socialists Democrats, and weak compromising Republicans we already have a “chief non law enforcement executive” occupying the White House—we do not need another.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.” (Matthew 23:27)

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

June 17, 2007

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

In an article on June 15, 2007, the New York Times www.nytimes.com/ stated that “Comments by Republican senators on Thursday suggested that they were feeling the heat from conservative critics of the bill, who object to provisions offering legal status.

According to the article, Trent Lott of Mississippi, the Republican whip, and supporter of the Immigration Bill (the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill”), reportedly said that “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”

First of all, it is comforting to know that Senator Lott realizes that he and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Senate are not running America. At least now “We The People” can understand why our so called leaders seem to be out of touch.

Second, Senator Lott is too out of touch to understand that Talk Radio is where he can get in touch with the real concerns and views of legal American citizens. Maybe the Senator should read the Rasmussen Report: “Poll: Voters Want Smaller Steps to Immigration Reform With Focus on Enforcement” www.rasmussenreports.com/

Third, Senator Lott appeared to not have a big problem with those same Talk Radio individuals who came to his defense when the Democrats and drive-by main stream media sought to shoot him out of the Senate. Senator Lott, a true hypocrite, probably wished that Talk Radio was running America then.

Fourth, Senator Lott and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Congress cannot effectively and timely deal with immigration, the budget, pork spending and other problems of the Government—how does he think he can deal with Talk Radio?

Fifth, if senator Lott truly believes that Talk Radio is a problem that needs to be dealt with, he is dangerous to conservatives and the Republican Party.

Sixth, Senator Lott attacks Talk Radio but appears to hide when it comes time to deal with the drive-by main stream media, who really is attempting to run America!

It appears that Senator Lott suffers from hypocrisy syndrome; the false assumption of an appearance of virtue, an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.

“Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” Matthew 7:5

They Will Not Let It Die—So, Consider This.

June 15, 2007

They Will Not Let It Die—So, Consider This.

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1). And there is a time to kill the “Immigration Bill”; a time to let it die.

They will not let the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill” die. https://worldviewpoints.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/

So, consider this:

“People who are pushing for a “guest worker” program show not the slightest interest in what has been happening under guest worker programs in Europe. Facts are apparently irrelevant.”

So is logic. “Guests are people you invite to your home.” …“Home invaders are people who break in, despite doors that have been shut to keep them out.”

“As for facts, guest workers from Third World countries have created centers of crime and violence in Europe, and some guest worker communities have become breeding grounds for terrorists.”

“Today’s illegal immigrants are too often analogized to early 20th century immigrants from Europe. But their situation is far more similar to that of contemporary “guest workers” in Europe.” —A Home Invader Program?, By Thomas Sowell
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2007/06/14

So, if our “leaders” are serious about a real “Alien Home Invasion Plan” then a start might be “The O’Reilly Plan”. The No Spin Immigration Solution—by Bill O’Reilly

Outline:
1) Secure the Southern Border
a. 700 miles of barrier
b. double the border patrol and back them up with 10,000 National Guards people.

2) Require All Illegal Aliens to Register
a. at the post office with Homeland Security.
b. given a tamper proof ID card, designating their temporary status and their right to work.
c. if the illegal aliens do not register, it’s a criminal felony.
d. subjecting the person to immediate deportation or jail time.

3) Business Executive Fines and Possible Prison Time
a. for hiring an illegal worker who doesn’t have a tamper proof ID card.

4) Illegal Alien Z-visa Case Review
a. by federal authorities decide who would stay. (No blanket amnesty, allowing rational decisions about who’s helping America and who isn’t).
b. No illegal alien who commits a crime while here would be allowed to stay.
c. No welfare of any kind would be paid to folks here illegally. They’d have to work for their living. http://www.billoreilly.com/currentarticle

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1)

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

June 6, 2007

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

How can the so called leaders of the USA be so blind to what they will do to this nation by passing the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Back Door Plea Bargain Bill?” Maybe they are so blinded by their own personal agendas that they cannot see the ditch ahead, while leaving through the back door after their bi-partisan negotiations.

Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” (Matthew 15:14)

President Bush in your own words, “you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all” by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

“Now is the time for comprehensive immigration reform. Now is the time for members of both political parties to stand up and show courage, and take a leadership role and do what’s right for America”, by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

President Bush, liberal Republicans, socialist Democrats and the secular humanist media insults the (legal) citizens of the USA by insisting that their current “Immigration Bill” is not Amnesty.

Well, what is Amnesty?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A pardon extended by the government to a group or class of persons, usu. for a political offense; the act of a sovereign power officially forgiving certain classes of persons who are subject to trial but have not yet been convicted <the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already present in the country> ● Unlike an ordinary pardon, amnesty is usu. addressed to crimes against state sovereignty –that is, to political offenses with respect to which forgiveness is deemed more expedient for the public welfare than prosecution and punishment. Amnesty is usu. general, addressed to classes or even communities.”

So if the so called leaders (the term used loosely since they all appear to be simply followers of their own backdoor destructive and blind agendas) and the secular humanist media do not want to be forthright and honest in calling it—their most recent affront on the (legal) citizens of the USA— what it is, then why not call it more accurately a plea bargain, then?

After all what is a Plea Bargain?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A negotiated agreement between a prosecutor and a criminal defendant whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to one of multiple charges in exchange for some concession by the prosecutor, usu. a more lenient sentence or a dismissal of the other charges — Also termed plea agreement…”

Based upon the most accepted Law Dictionary, the truth is that the current Immigration Bill is Amnesty and/or a Plea Bargain. It is an “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement” forced upon “We The People”—the legal citizens of this Country—by narcissistic leaders who have become blind as to who they represent and work for.

So that we are clear, what is a citizen?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who, by either birth or naturalization, is a member of a political community and being entitled to enjoy all its civil rights and protections; a member of the civil state, entitled to all its privileges”

What is an alien?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who resides within the borders of a country but is not a citizen or subject of that country; a person not owing allegiance to a particular nation. ● In the United States, an alien is a person who was born outside the jurisdiction of the United States, who is subject to some foreign government, and who has not been naturalized under U.S. law.”

What is an immigrant?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who arrives in a country to settle there permanently; a person who immigrates.

What does illegal mean?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“Forbidden by law; unlawful”

So an illegal immigrant is a person who, forbidden by law, arrives in a country to settle unlawfully there permanently.

Our so called leaders have a huge problem dealing with legal immigrants under the current laws, so how can they think that passing new laws will change any thing?

Recent terror plots by even legal immigrants should be enough to make us wake up and thoroughly scrutinize the current “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement”. Actually, what got us into the current situation is non enforcement of our current laws, after the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act fiasco.

This is not a time to be politically correct. Hastily legalizing a mass of law violators will be detrimental to the future of this Nation. The full ramifications of the proposed actions by the President and Congress, with this Bill, have yet to be realized and will not be for years to come.

Maybe it is time for “We The People” of America to get serious about replacing, at the voting booth, every politician (Republican, Democrat, Independent or any other) who will not see to it that the very laws they pass are enforced; instead of using new laws as masking tape to cover current laws.

However, the bottom line right now is that, we do not need another law that will not be enforced. All we need are real honest leaders who will see to it that the laws they pass are enforced and have the political backbone to be accountable and take responsible action when they are not enforced. This is why we again have to deal with this issue. In one word it is “negligence”, in three words, it is “dereliction of duty” by the U.S. Presidents and the U.S. Congresses.

The President and the Congress have a duty to uphold the Constitution and Laws of this Nation. Specifically, the President of the United States “…shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…” (Article II, Section 3 of The Constitution of the United States of America).

Why seek to implement new laws when you do not take care to faithfully execute the current laws?

Copyright © 2007 WorldViewPoints