Archive for the ‘Daily life’ category

One More Step Closer To The New World Order (NWO)

September 9, 2007

One More Step Closer To The New World Order (NWO)

Are You Still Sleeping? Wake up USA our right to life, liberty and property is at stake!

We are one more step closer to the “New World Order Government” (NWOG):
www.alipac.us/
www.alipac.us/
www.worldnetdaily.com/
www.worldnetdaily.com/

Who is Robert Pastor? His goal is to give away U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union. www.humanevents.com/

If you have read the information above, you can more clearly see that we are one more step closer to the “New World Order Government” (NWOG); the governmental establishment so secretly planned ages ago.

Are you still sleeping? Wake up citizens and legal immigrants of the once sovereign United States of America.

We The People” of this once great Republic have fallen asleep and have allowed the treasonous political/socialist elite, economic/socialist elite and religious/socialist elite to progressively subvert and hijack the Constitution of the United States of America!

This “New World Order Government” (NWOG) planned by the Elite will dramatically alter this Republic of our forefathers, as was graciously allowed by the One and only True GOD, our SAVIOUR and LORD JESUS CHRIST. [To be clear, this is not referencing some allah or any other idol/man-made god!].

“Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God:”
“But he that denieth me before men shall be denied before the angels of God.”
“And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven.”
“And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say:”
“For the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what ye ought to say.”
(Luke 12:8-12)

“Our founding fathers gave us a republic, which is a rule by law. The law was to protect the individual. The republic was simply a collective force of individuals to protect the individual’s right to life, liberty and property. Our founding fathers gave us a republic because they knew very well that a democracy was simply a temporary and transitional form of government on the way to totalitarian government. Those founding fathers were freedom-loving people who wanted to avoid all forms of state monopoly such as communism, nazism, fascism and even socialism.”—Larry Bates, “The New Economic Disorder”, page 98.

“Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?” (Romans 6:16)
“Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)
“For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?” (1Peter 4:17)

The time is come, the last days are here, so judgment must begin at the house of God—that is, the people of GOD, the family of GOD, in other words, judgment must begin with Christians—Wake Up USA, our right to life, liberty and property is at stake!

“Iraqi terrorists caught along Mexico border?”…Well, Then, Close The Borders

August 23, 2007

“Iraqi terrorists caught along Mexico border?”…Well, Then, Close The Borders

“President Bush’s top intelligence aide has confirmed that Iraqi terrorists have been captured coming into the United States from Mexico.” worldnetdaily.com/news/article
“The goal, McConnell said, is for terrorists to gain admittance to the United States, and then produce “mass casualties.”

Well, then, ClOSE THE BORDERS–this is not “rocket science”, President!.

How stupid can our leaders be? Or is this just another case of hypocrisy by U.S. Government leaders?

Barack Obama— A Victory for All Americans? What?

July 29, 2007

Barack Obama— A Victory for All Americans? What?
Maybe the Senator meant to say, it was a victory for all illegal aliens. Unfortunately, those are the words of just another “Washington wanna-be”, a “WWB”, who is a hypocrite.

(Hypocrisy is the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion, being hypocritical is with a false appearance of what is good; a hypocrite is an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.)

The WorldNetDaily.com reports that, “[T]he presidential hopeful praised the recent court decision overturning one city’s attempt to protect itself from hostile foreigners filling their streets with drugs, crime and gangs as “a victory for all Americans.”” www.worldnetdaily.com/news/

In his own divisive comment, Senator Obama suggests that this is a victory for all Americans! He wants to be the President of the United States, but does not allow local communities to act in their best interest and thus the best “interests of our national and economic security”.

Now, in his own divisive, exploitive and hypocritical quote from barackobama.com: “Barack Obama believes the immigration issue has been exploited by politicians to divide the nation rather than find real solutions. This divisiveness has allowed the illegal immigration problem to worsen, with borders that are less secure than ever and an economy that depends on millions of workers living in the shadows. Obama believes we must rise above divisive politics and act in the interests of our national and economic security. Obama has played a leading role in crafting comprehensive immigration reform and believes that our broken immigration system can only be fixed by putting politics aside and offering a solution that strengthens our security while reaffirming our heritage as a nation of immigrants.” www.barackobama.com/issues/

“Some of the most violent criminals at large today are illegal aliens. Yet in cities where the crime these aliens commit is highest, the police cannot use the most obvious tool to apprehend them: their immigration status.” “Sanctuary laws are a testament to the political power of immigrant lobbies.” www.cis.org/articles/

That report was as of 2004, how much worst are things now? How many more lives have been lost because of politically correct self-serving politicians like Senator Obama (a so called Christian)?

What about this Senator Obama? “MS-13 is attempting to become a unified criminal enterprise operating under one leadership.” “The Washington Times has obtained a copy of the letter and an Army intelligence presentation on the growth of MS-13, or Mara Salvatrucha.” http://washingtontimes.com/

Or, Senator Obama, what about this then? “Using the GAO report, Representative Steve King of Iowa points out that 25 Americans, on average, are killed by illegal aliens every day (about evenly split between motor vehicle accidents and outright murder).”
“Do the math: That works out to more than 9,000 deaths per year, or more than 36,000 deaths over the past four years. That’s more than ten times the number of Americans killed in Iraq over the past four years!” “Oddly, I’ve seen people in my hometown protesting against the war in Iraq, but I’ve never seen anyone protesting against the illegal alien invasion that is killing tens of thousands of Americans right here on our own soil.” www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/

Or, Senator Obama, you may need an education, so try this. “The Statue of Liberty is a monument dedicated to freedom and liberty. She never meant that foreigners have the right to violate America’s immigration laws.” “Calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a burglar an uninvited house guest.” www.illegalaliens.us/

And Senator Obama wants to be the Chief Law enforcement executive for the United States of America? Sorry Senator Obama, other socialists Democrats, and weak compromising Republicans we already have a “chief non law enforcement executive” occupying the White House—we do not need another.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.” (Matthew 23:27)

The 16th Amendment and Income Taxes?

July 26, 2007

The 16th Amendment and Income Taxes?
Amendment XVI (1913)-The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census of enumeration.
“…Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.” (Matthew 22:21)

According to Attorney Thomas Cryer, “[Working] is a God-given fundamental right that is protected under the Constitution and can’t be taxed any more than exercising freedom of speech.”www.worldnetdaily.com

WorldNetDaily.com reports that, “The Internal Revenue Service has lost a lawyer’s challenge in front of a jury to prove a constitutional foundation for the nation’s income tax, and the victorious attorney now is setting his sights higher.”

Attorney, Thomas Cryer [LSU Law School, Baton Rouge, LA, J.D. 1973, Honor Graduate] has taken on the IRS and has won a precedent setting case. http://www.youtube.com/

WND said that Cryer “argued that income is not necessarily any money that comes to a person, but rather categories such as profit and interest.” The article goes on to state that Cryer asserts that, “There’s no law making the average working man liable [for income taxes], there’s no law or regulation that allows the IRS to contend that earnings are 100 percent profit received in exchange for nothing, and the right to earn a living through any lawful occupation is a constitutionally protected fundamental right, and it is exempt from taxation.”

Attorney Cryer had asked the IRS to show him the legal authority that made him liable for the income tax but the IRS did not respond.

Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s.
Mark Chapter 12 of the Bible says;
14: And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?
15: Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.
16: And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar’s.
17: And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s. And they marvelled at him. (Mark 12:14-17)

Have we as citizens of the U.S. rendered more to “Caesar” than his due?

In this writers opinion there is a major legal threshold issue also, and that is, is there truly a legally ratified Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

“Bill Benson’s findings, published in “The Law That Never Was,” make a convincing case that the 16th amendment was not legally ratified and that Secretary of State Philander Knox was not merely in error, but committed fraud when he declared it ratified in February 1913. What follows is a summary of some of the major findings for many of the states, showing that their ratifications were not legal and should not have been counted.”
www.givemeliberty.org/taxes/notratified

According to his Motion to Dismiss (United States v. Tommy K. Cryer No. 06-50164-01 Western District of Louisiana Shreveport Division) Cryer argues that, “It is, therefore, respectfully submitted that insofar as the government purports to apply the income tax law as imposing a tax on wages, salaries and fees personally earned, it is in conflict with Article I, § 9, cl. 4, of the Constitution, and is, as so applied, unconstitutional and not entitled to enforcement.”

In his Motion, Attorney Cryer goes on to state that, “Based upon recent cases involving claims that wages are not income there is an apparently common misconception, an erroneous understanding or belief, that the issue of whether wages, salaries and fees personally earned are “income” within the meaning of the income tax law and, particularly, “within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment”, has been settled. It has not. One government official contends that wages are constitutionally taxable income because the Supreme Court has not found them to be otherwise.”

The LieFreeZone Website says “THE TRUTH: The income tax law, although it is carefully written to APPEAR otherwise, does not actually tax your wages, salaries and fees that you earn yourself because the Constitution does not allow the federal government to tax those earnings.”

The Site further states that “The Sixteenth Amendment DID NOT authorize the federal government to tax your PERSONALLY earned wages, but only that part of your wages that is PROFIT, or GAIN above and beyond what you gave up in order to receive them. Can you say what part of your wages are above and beyond your personal investment in earning them?” www.gcstation.net/liefreezone/

Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s. The question is, have we as citizens of the U.S. rendered more to “Caesar” than his due?

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

June 17, 2007

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

In an article on June 15, 2007, the New York Times www.nytimes.com/ stated that “Comments by Republican senators on Thursday suggested that they were feeling the heat from conservative critics of the bill, who object to provisions offering legal status.

According to the article, Trent Lott of Mississippi, the Republican whip, and supporter of the Immigration Bill (the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill”), reportedly said that “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”

First of all, it is comforting to know that Senator Lott realizes that he and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Senate are not running America. At least now “We The People” can understand why our so called leaders seem to be out of touch.

Second, Senator Lott is too out of touch to understand that Talk Radio is where he can get in touch with the real concerns and views of legal American citizens. Maybe the Senator should read the Rasmussen Report: “Poll: Voters Want Smaller Steps to Immigration Reform With Focus on Enforcement” www.rasmussenreports.com/

Third, Senator Lott appeared to not have a big problem with those same Talk Radio individuals who came to his defense when the Democrats and drive-by main stream media sought to shoot him out of the Senate. Senator Lott, a true hypocrite, probably wished that Talk Radio was running America then.

Fourth, Senator Lott and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Congress cannot effectively and timely deal with immigration, the budget, pork spending and other problems of the Government—how does he think he can deal with Talk Radio?

Fifth, if senator Lott truly believes that Talk Radio is a problem that needs to be dealt with, he is dangerous to conservatives and the Republican Party.

Sixth, Senator Lott attacks Talk Radio but appears to hide when it comes time to deal with the drive-by main stream media, who really is attempting to run America!

It appears that Senator Lott suffers from hypocrisy syndrome; the false assumption of an appearance of virtue, an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.

“Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” Matthew 7:5

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

June 6, 2007

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

How can the so called leaders of the USA be so blind to what they will do to this nation by passing the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Back Door Plea Bargain Bill?” Maybe they are so blinded by their own personal agendas that they cannot see the ditch ahead, while leaving through the back door after their bi-partisan negotiations.

Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” (Matthew 15:14)

President Bush in your own words, “you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all” by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

“Now is the time for comprehensive immigration reform. Now is the time for members of both political parties to stand up and show courage, and take a leadership role and do what’s right for America”, by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

President Bush, liberal Republicans, socialist Democrats and the secular humanist media insults the (legal) citizens of the USA by insisting that their current “Immigration Bill” is not Amnesty.

Well, what is Amnesty?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A pardon extended by the government to a group or class of persons, usu. for a political offense; the act of a sovereign power officially forgiving certain classes of persons who are subject to trial but have not yet been convicted <the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already present in the country> ● Unlike an ordinary pardon, amnesty is usu. addressed to crimes against state sovereignty –that is, to political offenses with respect to which forgiveness is deemed more expedient for the public welfare than prosecution and punishment. Amnesty is usu. general, addressed to classes or even communities.”

So if the so called leaders (the term used loosely since they all appear to be simply followers of their own backdoor destructive and blind agendas) and the secular humanist media do not want to be forthright and honest in calling it—their most recent affront on the (legal) citizens of the USA— what it is, then why not call it more accurately a plea bargain, then?

After all what is a Plea Bargain?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A negotiated agreement between a prosecutor and a criminal defendant whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to one of multiple charges in exchange for some concession by the prosecutor, usu. a more lenient sentence or a dismissal of the other charges — Also termed plea agreement…”

Based upon the most accepted Law Dictionary, the truth is that the current Immigration Bill is Amnesty and/or a Plea Bargain. It is an “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement” forced upon “We The People”—the legal citizens of this Country—by narcissistic leaders who have become blind as to who they represent and work for.

So that we are clear, what is a citizen?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who, by either birth or naturalization, is a member of a political community and being entitled to enjoy all its civil rights and protections; a member of the civil state, entitled to all its privileges”

What is an alien?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who resides within the borders of a country but is not a citizen or subject of that country; a person not owing allegiance to a particular nation. ● In the United States, an alien is a person who was born outside the jurisdiction of the United States, who is subject to some foreign government, and who has not been naturalized under U.S. law.”

What is an immigrant?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who arrives in a country to settle there permanently; a person who immigrates.

What does illegal mean?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“Forbidden by law; unlawful”

So an illegal immigrant is a person who, forbidden by law, arrives in a country to settle unlawfully there permanently.

Our so called leaders have a huge problem dealing with legal immigrants under the current laws, so how can they think that passing new laws will change any thing?

Recent terror plots by even legal immigrants should be enough to make us wake up and thoroughly scrutinize the current “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement”. Actually, what got us into the current situation is non enforcement of our current laws, after the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act fiasco.

This is not a time to be politically correct. Hastily legalizing a mass of law violators will be detrimental to the future of this Nation. The full ramifications of the proposed actions by the President and Congress, with this Bill, have yet to be realized and will not be for years to come.

Maybe it is time for “We The People” of America to get serious about replacing, at the voting booth, every politician (Republican, Democrat, Independent or any other) who will not see to it that the very laws they pass are enforced; instead of using new laws as masking tape to cover current laws.

However, the bottom line right now is that, we do not need another law that will not be enforced. All we need are real honest leaders who will see to it that the laws they pass are enforced and have the political backbone to be accountable and take responsible action when they are not enforced. This is why we again have to deal with this issue. In one word it is “negligence”, in three words, it is “dereliction of duty” by the U.S. Presidents and the U.S. Congresses.

The President and the Congress have a duty to uphold the Constitution and Laws of this Nation. Specifically, the President of the United States “…shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…” (Article II, Section 3 of The Constitution of the United States of America).

Why seek to implement new laws when you do not take care to faithfully execute the current laws?

Copyright © 2007 WorldViewPoints

Hillary Clinton: Statement of Pure Evil—“A Woman’s Right to Choose…”

April 18, 2007

Hillary Clinton: Statement of Pure Evil—“A Woman’s Right to Choose…”

4/18/2007-Hillary Clinton: From the Senate: Statement on Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. Carhart Decision; Washington, DC — “This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman’s right to choose and recognized the importance of women’s health. Today’s decision blatantly defies the Court’s recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.” http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1451

A Statement of Pure Evil—A Woman’s Right to Choose (to Kill their Baby)—addition added by this writer.

This is pure evil; how can a mother say that the rights and lives of women must be taken into account over the partial-birth abortion of a baby? What about the rights of fathers? Partial-birth abortion is one of the most evil and barbaric voluntary acts committed by humans.

[See excerpts quoted below from the Supreme Court Decision-and you be the judge]

Erosion of what constitutional rights?—you do not have a constitutional right to kill your baby? Maybe Hillary Clinton can show us where in the U.S Constitution it gives women the right to kill their baby.

Just because, in the past, there was an evil decision made by fallible Supreme Court Judges (mere men and women) does not mean that the U.S Constitution gives women the right to kill their baby.

Hillary Clinton, and any other human being, must have a “conscience seared with a hot iron” to really believe that killing a baby by choice is a constitutional right. This is merely “lies in hypocrisy” by a liberal politician seeking power.

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;” “Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” (1Timothy 4:1-2)

Now, you be the judge!

The following statements are quotes from the Supreme Court Decision: Gonzales v. Carhart; No. 05-380 April 18, 2007

Decision Excerpts: Abortion Methods

“Abortion methods vary depending to some extent on the preferences of the physician and, of course, on the term of the pregnancy and the resulting stage of the unborn child’s development. Between 85 and 90 percent of the approximately 1.3 million abortions performed each year in the United States take place in the first three months of pregnancy, which is to say in the first trimester.”

“The most common first-trimester abortion method is vacuum aspiration (otherwise known as suction curettage) in which the physician vacuums out the embryonic tissue. Early in this trimester an alternative is to use medication, such as mifepristone (commonly known as RU-486), to terminate the pregnancy.”

“Of the remaining abortions that take place each year, most occur in the second trimester. The surgical procedure referred to as “dilation and evacuation” or “D&E” is the usual abortion method in this trimester.”

“A doctor must first dilate the cervix at least to the extent needed to insert surgical instruments into the uterus and to maneuver them to evacuate the fetus.”

“The resulting amount of dilation is not uniform, and a doctor does not know in advance how an individual patient will respond. In general the longer dilators remain in the cervix, the more it will dilate. Yet the length of time doctors employ osmotic dilators varies. Some may keep dilators in the cervix for two days, while others use dilators for a day or less.”

“After sufficient dilation the surgical operation can commence. The woman is placed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. The doctor, often guided by ultrasound, inserts grasping forceps through the woman’s cervix and into the uterus to grab the fetus. The doctor grips a fetal part with the forceps and pulls it back through the cervix and vagina, continuing to pull even after meeting resistance from the cervix. The friction causes the fetus to tear apart. For example, a leg might be ripped off the fetus as it is pulled through the cervix and out of the woman. The process of evacuating the fetus piece by piece continues until it has been completely removed. A doctor may make 10 to 15 passes with the forceps to evacuate the fetus in its entirety, though sometimes removal is completed with fewer passes. Once the fetus has been evacuated, the placenta and any remaining fetal material are suctioned or scraped out of the uterus. The doctor examines the different parts to ensure the entire fetal body has been removed.”

“Some doctors, especially later in the second trimester, may kill the fetus a day or two before performing the surgical evacuation. They inject digoxin or potassium chloride into the fetus, the umbilical cord, or the amniotic fluid. Fetal demise may cause contractions and make greater dilation possible. Once dead, moreover, the fetus’ body will soften, and its removal will be easier. Other doctors refrain from injecting chemical agents, believing it adds risk with little or no medical benefit.” http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/

You be the judge!