Archive for the ‘Congress’ category

Barack Hussein Obama Is He Eligible or Not-Followup Three

October 26, 2008

Barack Hussein Obama Is He Eligible or Not-Followup Three

Lawsuit dismissed by a federal judge yesterday on grounds that citizens of the United States of America “lack standing to bring the lawsuit”. Every citizen should be completely outraged as to the stupidity of this decision!

The dis-honorable Judge R. Barclay Surrick* “concludes that ordinary citizens can’t sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office.” “Surrick defers to Congress, saying that the legislature could determine “that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency,” but that it would take new laws to grant individual citizens that ability.” “Until that time,” Surrick says, “voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring.” http://www.worldnetdaily.com/

Again, every citizen should be completely outraged as to the stupidity of this decision! Does Surrick recognize these words?

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, …do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Does Surrick even understand who “We the People” are? Does Surrick even understand who Congress represents and thus works for? Did Surrick even study the Constitution of the United States? This is a most dis-honorable decision by a dis-honorable judge.

Non-citizen “voters” may “not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring”; but CITIZENS do. Maybe Surrick may recognize these words—

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”

The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. (Emphasis Added)

*Updated Footnote:

Obama’s Birth Certificate Judge-Obama Linkage Update www.freerepublic.com/focus/

Dis-honorable connections?; U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick, Barack H. Obama, Michelle Obama, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Christopher B. Seaman (former law clerk for U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick) and Sidley Austin law firm.

And More… http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick

Advertisements

Progressive Socialism or Common Capitalism? –America at the Crossroads

October 3, 2008

Progressive Socialism or Common Capitalism? –America at the Crossroads

The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election comes down to this; do you want more Progressive Socialism or more Common Capitalism? More extensive corruption or maybe more government of the governed?

The Declaration of Independence says, “…We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –…”

As “the governed”, Citizens of America, you will reap what you sow! If you sow a government of corruption, hypocrisy, lies, deceit, higher taxes, more government running your life, you will get it. So do not complain when it happens.

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7

On his Web Site, Barack Hussein Obama describes himself as a “Progressive”. Someone who wants to move forward by taking more of the governed finances. He has socialist beliefs at the core of his actions.

Barack Hussein Obama is simply a progressive socialist who wants to govern with a “progressive socialism” agenda, do not be deceived.

America is at the crossroads, is capitalism the problem or deceitful corrupt politians? Barack Hussein Obama and his beliefs represent the 21st Century condition and failures of this Country.

Barack Hussein Obama and his wife Michelle, encouraged citizens to not strive to become “middleclassness”, while they, hypocritically, fought the political battles to not only achieve “middleclassism”, but to conquer true elitism.

However, Barack Hussein Obama says, that he and his wife are for the middleclass and are so concerned about protecting the middleclass—this is the epitome of deceit. And their deceitful words prove it. They think that the governed, (Citizens of America), are so stupid that they can just lie about anything. How can you say do not strive to become middleclass while saying that you are concern and want to protect the middleclass. Only by deceit and out right lies!

Congress passed at least a $25-billion bailout of mortgage firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Networks, Once Silent on Fannie Mae, Blame Capitalism for Debacle:

“Congress has passed at least a $25-billion bailout of mortgage firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and President Bush has said he will sign it.”

“In 2005, 2008 TV journalists wouldn’t criticize GSEs (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac); now reporters blame deregulation, GOP.”

““The poor choices of these two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) – and their sponsors in Washington – are largely to blame for our current mess,” Calomiris and Wallison said.”

“…since 2004 “Senator Obama has received about $126,000 in contributions from employees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while Senator McCain, over the last decade, has received about $22,000, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.”” www.businessandmedia.org/articles/

Barack Hussein Obama’s $920 billion Jubilee Act and Global Poverty Act:

“With one socialist “bailout” bill apparently on the way to passage by Congress, two more are pending―both of them sponsored by Senator Barack Obama. One is the Jubilee Act, which would cancel as much as $75 billion worth of Third World debt, and the other is the Global Poverty Act, which would cost an estimated $845 billion. Total potential cost: $920 billion.” www.aim.org/aim-column/

“Obama’s Global Poverty Act is in fact a stunning and sweeping step toward socialism and one-world government. When we look beyond the seductive title, and read the actual contents, we discover that Obama and Biden are setting America up for imposition of a global tax, controlled by the United Nations. For the first time, the U.S. could be forced to adopt a global tax at the behest of an international body. The planned amount is 0.7% of America’s Gross National Product (GNP) or $65 billion per year, in addition to America’s current foreign aid budget.” www.aim.org/aim-report/

US Congress Approved 25 billion dollars for Automakers

“Under provisions of the new legislation, not only US carmakers are eligible for the guarantees but also suppliers and foreign automakers with plants in the United States that are more than 20 years old — Nissan and Honda’s US operations qualify.” www.breitbart.com/article

Barack Hussein Obama’s and Acorn Agenda of Anti-Capitalism Connection:

“This is a story we’ve largely missed. While Obama’s Acorn connection has not gone entirely unreported, its depth, extent, and significance have been poorly understood.”

“…Obama’s role as an Acorn “leadership trainer” is noted, or his seats on the boards of foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects of Obama’s ties to Acorn.”

“Acorn is the key modern successor of the radical 1960’s “New Left,” with a “1960’s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism” to match. Acorn, says Stern, grew out of “one of the New Left’s silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare Rights Organization.” In the 1960’s, NWRO launched a campaign of sit-ins and disruptions at welfare offices. The goal was to remove eligibility restrictions, and thus effectively flood welfare rolls with so many clients that the system would burst. The theory, explains Stern, was that an impossibly overburdened welfare system would force “a radical reconstruction of America’s unjust capitalist economy.” Instead of a socialist utopia, however, we got the culture of dependency and family breakdown that ate away at America’s inner cities — until welfare reform began to turn the tide.”article.nationalreview.com

Barack Obama, Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger’s Anti-capitalist Acorn Connection:

“Not surprisingly it turns out that Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Father Michael Pfleger – two radical clergy closely associated with Obama – have extensive ties to ACORN . Their views fit nicely within the ACORN anti-capitalist agenda that they have been pushing for years.” www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Obama’s Acorn: A Leftist Social Reform Group:

“After seven years of hiding corruption, ACORN has admitted Dale Rathke, brother of founder, Wade Rathke had embezzled nearly $1 million from the company.”

“ACORN is connected to money laundering, misuse of taxpayer funds, voter fraud especially in the Presidential Primaries, Wage and Hour Issues among their employees, and even safety issues in their offices. They are interfering in gubernatorial races especially in the State of Indiana. Their interference in the political arena knows no bounds. ACORN is the umbrella company to at least 75 non-profits…” http://theunionlabelblog.com/

Fractional Reserve Banking; Legalized Counterfeiting Ring Headed up by the Government’s Federal Reserve:

“[O]ne part of the contemporary flight from sound, free market money to statized and inflated money: the abolition of the gold standard by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933, and the substitution of fiat paper tickets by the Federal Reserve as our “monetary standard.””

“Another crucial part of this process was the federal cartelization of the nation’s banks through the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913.”

“Banks make money by literally creating money out of thin air, nowadays exclusively deposits rather than bank notes. This sort of swindling or counterfeiting is dignified by the term “fractional-reserve banking,” which means that bank deposits are backed by only a small fraction of the cash they promise to have at hand and redeem. (Right now, in the United States, this minimum fraction is fixed by the Federal Reserve System at 10 percent.)” http://www.fdrs.org/

Is Capitalism on the Ropes?

“What do you say we actually try capitalism, where private actors reap rewards and assume the risk?”

“Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama promises “world-class” education — with taxpayers paying for it. And the federal government, in dramatic contradiction with the limited-government intention of the Constitution, involves itself in health care, guaranteeing private-sector retirement accounts, disaster relief, welfare, unemployment compensation benefits, retirement benefits, etc.”

“So, yes, our recent financial turmoil does suggest failure — a failure to truly practice capitalism and a failure to accept and believe in the value, appropriateness and morality of a limited government and maximum personal responsibility.” jewishworldreview.com/

Governed Citizen of America the choice is yours!

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

“For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.”

“And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.” Galatians 6:7-9

Democrat Senators Speaking Lies in Hypocrisy

October 3, 2007

Democrat Senators Speaking Lies in Hypocrisy

Democrat senators supported and spoke lies in hypocrisy on the Floor of the Senate earlier this week. The cast of senators have no conscience or their conscience must seared with a hot iron to be able to stand and lie about what Mr. Rush Limbaugh said on radio.

“Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” 1Timothy 4:2

In a letter on October 2, 2007 to the CEO of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. certain democrat party leaders spent precious tax payer time and money to put forth the blatant distortions (lies) of a liberal blog conservative-hate-group called “Media Matters”.

In part the letter states; “Although Americans of goodwill debate the merits of this war, we can all agree that those who serve with such great courage deserve our deepest respect and gratitude. That is why Rush Limbaugh’s recent characterization of troops who oppose the war as “phony soldiers” is such an outrage.” www.drudgereport.com/

Here are some of the “phony soldiers”: www.armytimes.com/

To sum up the contrived liberal controversy, listen to what Mark Levin says: hotair.com/audio-mark-levin

This writer can say in all truthfulness, that the lies put forth by Media Matters and picked up by the cast of senate liars is a disgrace to this country and every true legal American should be outraged at how these so called leaders behave. This writer can say this because of listening to what was said on that show and having begun listening to Mr. Limbaugh soon after going on the radio years ago. This Cast is an embarrassment to America.

The Cast Speaking lies in hypocrisy:

Senator Harry Reid, Majority Leader
Senator Richard Durbin, Assistant Majority Leader
Senator Charles Schumer, Vice Chairman, Democratic Conference
Senator Patty Murray, Secretary, Democratic Conference
Senator Daniel Akaka
Senator Max Baucus
Senator Joseph Biden
Senator Barbara Boxer
Senator Sherrod Brown
Senator Robert Byrd
Senator Benjamin Cardin
Senator Tom Carper
Senator Bob Casey
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
Senator Kent Conrad
Senator Christopher Dodd
Senator Byron Dorgan
Senator Dianne Feinstein
Senator Tom Harkin
Senator Daniel Inouye
Senator Edward M. Kennedy
Senator John Kerry
Senator Amy Klobuchar
Senator Mary Landrieu
Senator Frank Lautenberg
Senator Patrick Leahy
Senator Carl Levin
Senator Blanche Lincoln
Senator Bob Menendez
Senator Barbara Mikulski
Senator Bill Nelson
Senator Barack Obama
Senator Jack Reed
Senator Jay Rockefeller
Senator Ken Salazar
Senator Bernie Sanders
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Jon Tester
Senator Jim Webb
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
Senator Ron Wyden

“Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” 1Timothy 4:2

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44

We must stand for the truth or we have nothing to fight for!

 

Barack Obama— A Victory for All Americans? What?

July 29, 2007

Barack Obama— A Victory for All Americans? What?
Maybe the Senator meant to say, it was a victory for all illegal aliens. Unfortunately, those are the words of just another “Washington wanna-be”, a “WWB”, who is a hypocrite.

(Hypocrisy is the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion, being hypocritical is with a false appearance of what is good; a hypocrite is an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.)

The WorldNetDaily.com reports that, “[T]he presidential hopeful praised the recent court decision overturning one city’s attempt to protect itself from hostile foreigners filling their streets with drugs, crime and gangs as “a victory for all Americans.”” www.worldnetdaily.com/news/

In his own divisive comment, Senator Obama suggests that this is a victory for all Americans! He wants to be the President of the United States, but does not allow local communities to act in their best interest and thus the best “interests of our national and economic security”.

Now, in his own divisive, exploitive and hypocritical quote from barackobama.com: “Barack Obama believes the immigration issue has been exploited by politicians to divide the nation rather than find real solutions. This divisiveness has allowed the illegal immigration problem to worsen, with borders that are less secure than ever and an economy that depends on millions of workers living in the shadows. Obama believes we must rise above divisive politics and act in the interests of our national and economic security. Obama has played a leading role in crafting comprehensive immigration reform and believes that our broken immigration system can only be fixed by putting politics aside and offering a solution that strengthens our security while reaffirming our heritage as a nation of immigrants.” www.barackobama.com/issues/

“Some of the most violent criminals at large today are illegal aliens. Yet in cities where the crime these aliens commit is highest, the police cannot use the most obvious tool to apprehend them: their immigration status.” “Sanctuary laws are a testament to the political power of immigrant lobbies.” www.cis.org/articles/

That report was as of 2004, how much worst are things now? How many more lives have been lost because of politically correct self-serving politicians like Senator Obama (a so called Christian)?

What about this Senator Obama? “MS-13 is attempting to become a unified criminal enterprise operating under one leadership.” “The Washington Times has obtained a copy of the letter and an Army intelligence presentation on the growth of MS-13, or Mara Salvatrucha.” http://washingtontimes.com/

Or, Senator Obama, what about this then? “Using the GAO report, Representative Steve King of Iowa points out that 25 Americans, on average, are killed by illegal aliens every day (about evenly split between motor vehicle accidents and outright murder).”
“Do the math: That works out to more than 9,000 deaths per year, or more than 36,000 deaths over the past four years. That’s more than ten times the number of Americans killed in Iraq over the past four years!” “Oddly, I’ve seen people in my hometown protesting against the war in Iraq, but I’ve never seen anyone protesting against the illegal alien invasion that is killing tens of thousands of Americans right here on our own soil.” www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/

Or, Senator Obama, you may need an education, so try this. “The Statue of Liberty is a monument dedicated to freedom and liberty. She never meant that foreigners have the right to violate America’s immigration laws.” “Calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a burglar an uninvited house guest.” www.illegalaliens.us/

And Senator Obama wants to be the Chief Law enforcement executive for the United States of America? Sorry Senator Obama, other socialists Democrats, and weak compromising Republicans we already have a “chief non law enforcement executive” occupying the White House—we do not need another.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.” (Matthew 23:27)

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

June 17, 2007

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

In an article on June 15, 2007, the New York Times www.nytimes.com/ stated that “Comments by Republican senators on Thursday suggested that they were feeling the heat from conservative critics of the bill, who object to provisions offering legal status.

According to the article, Trent Lott of Mississippi, the Republican whip, and supporter of the Immigration Bill (the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill”), reportedly said that “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”

First of all, it is comforting to know that Senator Lott realizes that he and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Senate are not running America. At least now “We The People” can understand why our so called leaders seem to be out of touch.

Second, Senator Lott is too out of touch to understand that Talk Radio is where he can get in touch with the real concerns and views of legal American citizens. Maybe the Senator should read the Rasmussen Report: “Poll: Voters Want Smaller Steps to Immigration Reform With Focus on Enforcement” www.rasmussenreports.com/

Third, Senator Lott appeared to not have a big problem with those same Talk Radio individuals who came to his defense when the Democrats and drive-by main stream media sought to shoot him out of the Senate. Senator Lott, a true hypocrite, probably wished that Talk Radio was running America then.

Fourth, Senator Lott and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Congress cannot effectively and timely deal with immigration, the budget, pork spending and other problems of the Government—how does he think he can deal with Talk Radio?

Fifth, if senator Lott truly believes that Talk Radio is a problem that needs to be dealt with, he is dangerous to conservatives and the Republican Party.

Sixth, Senator Lott attacks Talk Radio but appears to hide when it comes time to deal with the drive-by main stream media, who really is attempting to run America!

It appears that Senator Lott suffers from hypocrisy syndrome; the false assumption of an appearance of virtue, an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.

“Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” Matthew 7:5

They Will Not Let It Die—So, Consider This.

June 15, 2007

They Will Not Let It Die—So, Consider This.

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1). And there is a time to kill the “Immigration Bill”; a time to let it die.

They will not let the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill” die. https://worldviewpoints.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/

So, consider this:

“People who are pushing for a “guest worker” program show not the slightest interest in what has been happening under guest worker programs in Europe. Facts are apparently irrelevant.”

So is logic. “Guests are people you invite to your home.” …“Home invaders are people who break in, despite doors that have been shut to keep them out.”

“As for facts, guest workers from Third World countries have created centers of crime and violence in Europe, and some guest worker communities have become breeding grounds for terrorists.”

“Today’s illegal immigrants are too often analogized to early 20th century immigrants from Europe. But their situation is far more similar to that of contemporary “guest workers” in Europe.” —A Home Invader Program?, By Thomas Sowell
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2007/06/14

So, if our “leaders” are serious about a real “Alien Home Invasion Plan” then a start might be “The O’Reilly Plan”. The No Spin Immigration Solution—by Bill O’Reilly

Outline:
1) Secure the Southern Border
a. 700 miles of barrier
b. double the border patrol and back them up with 10,000 National Guards people.

2) Require All Illegal Aliens to Register
a. at the post office with Homeland Security.
b. given a tamper proof ID card, designating their temporary status and their right to work.
c. if the illegal aliens do not register, it’s a criminal felony.
d. subjecting the person to immediate deportation or jail time.

3) Business Executive Fines and Possible Prison Time
a. for hiring an illegal worker who doesn’t have a tamper proof ID card.

4) Illegal Alien Z-visa Case Review
a. by federal authorities decide who would stay. (No blanket amnesty, allowing rational decisions about who’s helping America and who isn’t).
b. No illegal alien who commits a crime while here would be allowed to stay.
c. No welfare of any kind would be paid to folks here illegally. They’d have to work for their living. http://www.billoreilly.com/currentarticle

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1)

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

June 6, 2007

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

How can the so called leaders of the USA be so blind to what they will do to this nation by passing the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Back Door Plea Bargain Bill?” Maybe they are so blinded by their own personal agendas that they cannot see the ditch ahead, while leaving through the back door after their bi-partisan negotiations.

Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” (Matthew 15:14)

President Bush in your own words, “you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all” by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

“Now is the time for comprehensive immigration reform. Now is the time for members of both political parties to stand up and show courage, and take a leadership role and do what’s right for America”, by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

President Bush, liberal Republicans, socialist Democrats and the secular humanist media insults the (legal) citizens of the USA by insisting that their current “Immigration Bill” is not Amnesty.

Well, what is Amnesty?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A pardon extended by the government to a group or class of persons, usu. for a political offense; the act of a sovereign power officially forgiving certain classes of persons who are subject to trial but have not yet been convicted <the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already present in the country> ● Unlike an ordinary pardon, amnesty is usu. addressed to crimes against state sovereignty –that is, to political offenses with respect to which forgiveness is deemed more expedient for the public welfare than prosecution and punishment. Amnesty is usu. general, addressed to classes or even communities.”

So if the so called leaders (the term used loosely since they all appear to be simply followers of their own backdoor destructive and blind agendas) and the secular humanist media do not want to be forthright and honest in calling it—their most recent affront on the (legal) citizens of the USA— what it is, then why not call it more accurately a plea bargain, then?

After all what is a Plea Bargain?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A negotiated agreement between a prosecutor and a criminal defendant whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to one of multiple charges in exchange for some concession by the prosecutor, usu. a more lenient sentence or a dismissal of the other charges — Also termed plea agreement…”

Based upon the most accepted Law Dictionary, the truth is that the current Immigration Bill is Amnesty and/or a Plea Bargain. It is an “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement” forced upon “We The People”—the legal citizens of this Country—by narcissistic leaders who have become blind as to who they represent and work for.

So that we are clear, what is a citizen?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who, by either birth or naturalization, is a member of a political community and being entitled to enjoy all its civil rights and protections; a member of the civil state, entitled to all its privileges”

What is an alien?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who resides within the borders of a country but is not a citizen or subject of that country; a person not owing allegiance to a particular nation. ● In the United States, an alien is a person who was born outside the jurisdiction of the United States, who is subject to some foreign government, and who has not been naturalized under U.S. law.”

What is an immigrant?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who arrives in a country to settle there permanently; a person who immigrates.

What does illegal mean?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“Forbidden by law; unlawful”

So an illegal immigrant is a person who, forbidden by law, arrives in a country to settle unlawfully there permanently.

Our so called leaders have a huge problem dealing with legal immigrants under the current laws, so how can they think that passing new laws will change any thing?

Recent terror plots by even legal immigrants should be enough to make us wake up and thoroughly scrutinize the current “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement”. Actually, what got us into the current situation is non enforcement of our current laws, after the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act fiasco.

This is not a time to be politically correct. Hastily legalizing a mass of law violators will be detrimental to the future of this Nation. The full ramifications of the proposed actions by the President and Congress, with this Bill, have yet to be realized and will not be for years to come.

Maybe it is time for “We The People” of America to get serious about replacing, at the voting booth, every politician (Republican, Democrat, Independent or any other) who will not see to it that the very laws they pass are enforced; instead of using new laws as masking tape to cover current laws.

However, the bottom line right now is that, we do not need another law that will not be enforced. All we need are real honest leaders who will see to it that the laws they pass are enforced and have the political backbone to be accountable and take responsible action when they are not enforced. This is why we again have to deal with this issue. In one word it is “negligence”, in three words, it is “dereliction of duty” by the U.S. Presidents and the U.S. Congresses.

The President and the Congress have a duty to uphold the Constitution and Laws of this Nation. Specifically, the President of the United States “…shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…” (Article II, Section 3 of The Constitution of the United States of America).

Why seek to implement new laws when you do not take care to faithfully execute the current laws?

Copyright © 2007 WorldViewPoints