Barack Hussein Obama Is He Eligible or Not-Followup Three

Barack Hussein Obama Is He Eligible or Not-Followup Three

Lawsuit dismissed by a federal judge yesterday on grounds that citizens of the United States of America “lack standing to bring the lawsuit”. Every citizen should be completely outraged as to the stupidity of this decision!

The dis-honorable Judge R. Barclay Surrick* “concludes that ordinary citizens can’t sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office.” “Surrick defers to Congress, saying that the legislature could determine “that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency,” but that it would take new laws to grant individual citizens that ability.” “Until that time,” Surrick says, “voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring.”

Again, every citizen should be completely outraged as to the stupidity of this decision! Does Surrick recognize these words?

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, …do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Does Surrick even understand who “We the People” are? Does Surrick even understand who Congress represents and thus works for? Did Surrick even study the Constitution of the United States? This is a most dis-honorable decision by a dis-honorable judge.

Non-citizen “voters” may “not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring”; but CITIZENS do. Maybe Surrick may recognize these words—

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”

The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. (Emphasis Added)

*Updated Footnote:

Obama’s Birth Certificate Judge-Obama Linkage Update

Dis-honorable connections?; U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick, Barack H. Obama, Michelle Obama, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Christopher B. Seaman (former law clerk for U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick) and Sidley Austin law firm.

And More…

Explore posts in the same categories: Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Citizenship, Congress, Constitution, Courts, Current Events, Government, In The News, Law, News and politics, Obama, Politics, Presidential Election, U.S. Citizen

%d bloggers like this: