With Barack Obama You Will Get Change

With Barack Obama You Will Get Change

The endorsement of Senator Barack Obama by Senator Edward Kennedy, one of the most extreme liberal/socialists in the U.S. Government is nothing for the Constitutional United States of America to be proud of.

Yes, it does bring us closer to change in America, but the change Barack Obama will bring, if elected President, will not be the right change for the Constitutional United States of America.

Barack Obama does “stand for change”, “change we can believe in”, if that change is socialism for the United States of America; as symbolized by the endorsement of Mr. “Socialism” , himself, Edward Kennedy.

Wise up America; why else would Senator Kennedy come out to endorse Senator Obama? Mr. “Socialism” sees the possibility of a Socialist Union of the American States down the road for America, if Obama is elected. Are you ready for a socialist world view in how you live?

Mr. “Progressive” Obama stands for change, but did not stand up to be counted for a number of votes in office with a yea or a nay, but with nod of “present”. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/

Mr. “Progressive”, who wants to be President, does not have the courage to stand up and take a position on a number of matters he was sent to handle. This is either a sign of weakness or deception—maybe both.

America, do not be deceived, lied to and lured into a world view this country may not be ready for.

“If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked.” (Proverb 29:12)

Speaking of lies by Barack Obama: “On Dec. 22 at the Smoky Row Coffee Shop in Oskaloosa, Iowa, the locals asked Obama about his Muslim roots. He said: “My father was from Kenya. A lot of people in his village were Muslim. He didn’t practice Islam. Truth is, he wasn’t very religious.” That was a lie. Obama’s father and stepfather were devout Islamics. Both faithfully practiced their religion. His stepfather, who had a much greater impact on Obama’s upbringing, was a radical Wahabbi Muslim. “My mother was a Christian from Kansas.” That was also a lie. Obama’s mother, his material grandmother and grandfather were all atheists. “They married and then divorced. I was raised by my mother. So, I’ve always been a Christian. The only connection I’ve had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father’s side came from that country. But I’ve never practiced Islam…For a while I lived in Indonesia because my mother was teaching there. And that’s a Muslim country. And I went to school—but I didn’t practice Islam.” Another lie. Obama’s mother married Lolo Soetoro, a Wahabbi extremist who lived in Indonesia. When Obama’s mother moved to Indonesia—before she married her second Muslim husband—she enrolled her son in Francis Assisis Catholic School. He was enrolled as a Muslim because he was a Muslim. The enrollment form required each student to choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when enrolling: Buddhist, Catholic, Hindu, Muslim, or Protestant. Had he been a lifelong Christian, or even a recent convert, he—or his mother—would have circled Protestant.” {Emphasis added} www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/

This writer agrees with the following statement by the author of this article; “The American people need to be asking Barack Obama a whole different list of questions when they attend his political rallies on his quest to become the leader of the free world. They need to ask the man who he really is because, up to this point on the campaign trail, he has lied to them. The American people need to find an honest candidate. Barack Obama is not that man.”—Comments by Jon C. Ryter www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/

Every real American need to take the time read this article in total!

“If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked.” (Proverb 29:12)
“The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.” (Psalm 58:3)

“Blessed is that man that maketh the LORD his trust, and respecteth not the proud, nor such as turn aside to lies.” (Psalm 40:4)

The 16th Amendment and Income Taxes?

The 16th Amendment and Income Taxes?
Amendment XVI (1913)-The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census of enumeration.
“…Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.” (Matthew 22:21)

According to Attorney Thomas Cryer, “[Working] is a God-given fundamental right that is protected under the Constitution and can’t be taxed any more than exercising freedom of speech.”www.worldnetdaily.com

WorldNetDaily.com reports that, “The Internal Revenue Service has lost a lawyer’s challenge in front of a jury to prove a constitutional foundation for the nation’s income tax, and the victorious attorney now is setting his sights higher.”

Attorney, Thomas Cryer [LSU Law School, Baton Rouge, LA, J.D. 1973, Honor Graduate] has taken on the IRS and has won a precedent setting case. http://www.youtube.com/

WND said that Cryer “argued that income is not necessarily any money that comes to a person, but rather categories such as profit and interest.” The article goes on to state that Cryer asserts that, “There’s no law making the average working man liable [for income taxes], there’s no law or regulation that allows the IRS to contend that earnings are 100 percent profit received in exchange for nothing, and the right to earn a living through any lawful occupation is a constitutionally protected fundamental right, and it is exempt from taxation.”

Attorney Cryer had asked the IRS to show him the legal authority that made him liable for the income tax but the IRS did not respond.

Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s.
Mark Chapter 12 of the Bible says;
14: And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?
15: Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.
16: And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar’s.
17: And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s. And they marvelled at him. (Mark 12:14-17)

Have we as citizens of the U.S. rendered more to “Caesar” than his due?

In this writers opinion there is a major legal threshold issue also, and that is, is there truly a legally ratified Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

“Bill Benson’s findings, published in “The Law That Never Was,” make a convincing case that the 16th amendment was not legally ratified and that Secretary of State Philander Knox was not merely in error, but committed fraud when he declared it ratified in February 1913. What follows is a summary of some of the major findings for many of the states, showing that their ratifications were not legal and should not have been counted.”
www.givemeliberty.org/taxes/notratified

According to his Motion to Dismiss (United States v. Tommy K. Cryer No. 06-50164-01 Western District of Louisiana Shreveport Division) Cryer argues that, “It is, therefore, respectfully submitted that insofar as the government purports to apply the income tax law as imposing a tax on wages, salaries and fees personally earned, it is in conflict with Article I, § 9, cl. 4, of the Constitution, and is, as so applied, unconstitutional and not entitled to enforcement.”

In his Motion, Attorney Cryer goes on to state that, “Based upon recent cases involving claims that wages are not income there is an apparently common misconception, an erroneous understanding or belief, that the issue of whether wages, salaries and fees personally earned are “income” within the meaning of the income tax law and, particularly, “within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment”, has been settled. It has not. One government official contends that wages are constitutionally taxable income because the Supreme Court has not found them to be otherwise.”

The LieFreeZone Website says “THE TRUTH: The income tax law, although it is carefully written to APPEAR otherwise, does not actually tax your wages, salaries and fees that you earn yourself because the Constitution does not allow the federal government to tax those earnings.”

The Site further states that “The Sixteenth Amendment DID NOT authorize the federal government to tax your PERSONALLY earned wages, but only that part of your wages that is PROFIT, or GAIN above and beyond what you gave up in order to receive them. Can you say what part of your wages are above and beyond your personal investment in earning them?” www.gcstation.net/liefreezone/

Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s. The question is, have we as citizens of the U.S. rendered more to “Caesar” than his due?

MOORE HYPOCRISY-More Hypocrisy from “Sicko”, Himself

MOORE HYPOCRISY-More Hypocrisy from “Sicko”, Himself

In “An Open Letter to CNN from Michael Moore”, Saturday, July 14th, 2007, Michael Moore has the hypocritical nerve to suggest to CNN that they “set the record straight, and apologize to your viewers”, Moore goes on to speak about “honesty” and states, “After what the public saw with your report on “Sicko,” and how many inaccuracies that report contained, how can anyone believe anything you say…” [Quotes taken from “An Open Letter to CNN from Michael Moore” Saturday, July 14th, 2007]

What about this…

http://www.qubetv.tv/videos/detail/880

www.shootingmichaelmoore.com

Well, Michael Moore, before hypocritically suggesting to anyone that they should;
1. “set the record straight”,
2. “apologize to your viewers”,
3. “who keeps you honest?”,
4. “how many inaccuracies that report contained”,
5. “how can anyone believe anything you say…”,

“Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” Matthew 7:5

One thing is for sure and accurate, Michael Moore has become America’s “worst nightmare”.

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

Trent Lott—Out of Touch, a Hypocrite and Dangerous to Conservatives

In an article on June 15, 2007, the New York Times www.nytimes.com/ stated that “Comments by Republican senators on Thursday suggested that they were feeling the heat from conservative critics of the bill, who object to provisions offering legal status.

According to the article, Trent Lott of Mississippi, the Republican whip, and supporter of the Immigration Bill (the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill”), reportedly said that “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”

First of all, it is comforting to know that Senator Lott realizes that he and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Senate are not running America. At least now “We The People” can understand why our so called leaders seem to be out of touch.

Second, Senator Lott is too out of touch to understand that Talk Radio is where he can get in touch with the real concerns and views of legal American citizens. Maybe the Senator should read the Rasmussen Report: “Poll: Voters Want Smaller Steps to Immigration Reform With Focus on Enforcement” www.rasmussenreports.com/

Third, Senator Lott appeared to not have a big problem with those same Talk Radio individuals who came to his defense when the Democrats and drive-by main stream media sought to shoot him out of the Senate. Senator Lott, a true hypocrite, probably wished that Talk Radio was running America then.

Fourth, Senator Lott and his out of touch colleagues in the U.S. Congress cannot effectively and timely deal with immigration, the budget, pork spending and other problems of the Government—how does he think he can deal with Talk Radio?

Fifth, if senator Lott truly believes that Talk Radio is a problem that needs to be dealt with, he is dangerous to conservatives and the Republican Party.

Sixth, Senator Lott attacks Talk Radio but appears to hide when it comes time to deal with the drive-by main stream media, who really is attempting to run America!

It appears that Senator Lott suffers from hypocrisy syndrome; the false assumption of an appearance of virtue, an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.

“Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” Matthew 7:5

They Will Not Let It Die—So, Consider This.

They Will Not Let It Die—So, Consider This.

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1). And there is a time to kill the “Immigration Bill”; a time to let it die.

They will not let the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Backdoor Plea Bargain Bill” die. http://worldviewpoints.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/

So, consider this:

“People who are pushing for a “guest worker” program show not the slightest interest in what has been happening under guest worker programs in Europe. Facts are apparently irrelevant.”

So is logic. “Guests are people you invite to your home.” …“Home invaders are people who break in, despite doors that have been shut to keep them out.”

“As for facts, guest workers from Third World countries have created centers of crime and violence in Europe, and some guest worker communities have become breeding grounds for terrorists.”

“Today’s illegal immigrants are too often analogized to early 20th century immigrants from Europe. But their situation is far more similar to that of contemporary “guest workers” in Europe.” —A Home Invader Program?, By Thomas Sowell
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2007/06/14

So, if our “leaders” are serious about a real “Alien Home Invasion Plan” then a start might be “The O’Reilly Plan”. The No Spin Immigration Solution—by Bill O’Reilly

Outline:
1) Secure the Southern Border
a. 700 miles of barrier
b. double the border patrol and back them up with 10,000 National Guards people.

2) Require All Illegal Aliens to Register
a. at the post office with Homeland Security.
b. given a tamper proof ID card, designating their temporary status and their right to work.
c. if the illegal aliens do not register, it’s a criminal felony.
d. subjecting the person to immediate deportation or jail time.

3) Business Executive Fines and Possible Prison Time
a. for hiring an illegal worker who doesn’t have a tamper proof ID card.

4) Illegal Alien Z-visa Case Review
a. by federal authorities decide who would stay. (No blanket amnesty, allowing rational decisions about who’s helping America and who isn’t).
b. No illegal alien who commits a crime while here would be allowed to stay.
c. No welfare of any kind would be paid to folks here illegally. They’d have to work for their living. http://www.billoreilly.com/currentarticle

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecclesiastes 3:1)

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

It’s Not Amnesty?—Ok, Maybe It’s A Back Door Plea Bargain

How can the so called leaders of the USA be so blind to what they will do to this nation by passing the “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Back Door Plea Bargain Bill?” Maybe they are so blinded by their own personal agendas that they cannot see the ditch ahead, while leaving through the back door after their bi-partisan negotiations.

“Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” (Matthew 15:14)

President Bush in your own words, “you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all” by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

“Now is the time for comprehensive immigration reform. Now is the time for members of both political parties to stand up and show courage, and take a leadership role and do what’s right for America”, by not giving this Country to criminals (illegal aliens of any nation) who continue to violate the Constitution and laws of the United States of America!

President Bush, liberal Republicans, socialist Democrats and the secular humanist media insults the (legal) citizens of the USA by insisting that their current “Immigration Bill” is not Amnesty.

Well, what is Amnesty?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A pardon extended by the government to a group or class of persons, usu. for a political offense; the act of a sovereign power officially forgiving certain classes of persons who are subject to trial but have not yet been convicted <the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already present in the country> ● Unlike an ordinary pardon, amnesty is usu. addressed to crimes against state sovereignty –that is, to political offenses with respect to which forgiveness is deemed more expedient for the public welfare than prosecution and punishment. Amnesty is usu. general, addressed to classes or even communities.”

So if the so called leaders (the term used loosely since they all appear to be simply followers of their own backdoor destructive and blind agendas) and the secular humanist media do not want to be forthright and honest in calling it—their most recent affront on the (legal) citizens of the USA— what it is, then why not call it more accurately a plea bargain, then?

After all what is a Plea Bargain?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A negotiated agreement between a prosecutor and a criminal defendant whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to one of multiple charges in exchange for some concession by the prosecutor, usu. a more lenient sentence or a dismissal of the other charges — Also termed plea agreement…”

Based upon the most accepted Law Dictionary, the truth is that the current Immigration Bill is Amnesty and/or a Plea Bargain. It is an “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement” forced upon “We The People”—the legal citizens of this Country—by narcissistic leaders who have become blind as to who they represent and work for.

So that we are clear, what is a citizen?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who, by either birth or naturalization, is a member of a political community and being entitled to enjoy all its civil rights and protections; a member of the civil state, entitled to all its privileges”

What is an alien?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who resides within the borders of a country but is not a citizen or subject of that country; a person not owing allegiance to a particular nation. ● In the United States, an alien is a person who was born outside the jurisdiction of the United States, who is subject to some foreign government, and who has not been naturalized under U.S. law.”

What is an immigrant?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“A person who arrives in a country to settle there permanently; a person who immigrates.

What does illegal mean?
According to Black’s Law Dictionary—Eighth Edition:
“Forbidden by law; unlawful”

So an illegal immigrant is a person who, forbidden by law, arrives in a country to settle unlawfully there permanently.

Our so called leaders have a huge problem dealing with legal immigrants under the current laws, so how can they think that passing new laws will change any thing?

Recent terror plots by even legal immigrants should be enough to make us wake up and thoroughly scrutinize the current “Alien Immigration-Amnesty/Plea Bargain Agreement”. Actually, what got us into the current situation is non enforcement of our current laws, after the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act fiasco.

This is not a time to be politically correct. Hastily legalizing a mass of law violators will be detrimental to the future of this Nation. The full ramifications of the proposed actions by the President and Congress, with this Bill, have yet to be realized and will not be for years to come.

Maybe it is time for “We The People” of America to get serious about replacing, at the voting booth, every politician (Republican, Democrat, Independent or any other) who will not see to it that the very laws they pass are enforced; instead of using new laws as masking tape to cover current laws.

However, the bottom line right now is that, we do not need another law that will not be enforced. All we need are real honest leaders who will see to it that the laws they pass are enforced and have the political backbone to be accountable and take responsible action when they are not enforced. This is why we again have to deal with this issue. In one word it is “negligence”, in three words, it is “dereliction of duty” by the U.S. Presidents and the U.S. Congresses.

The President and the Congress have a duty to uphold the Constitution and Laws of this Nation. Specifically, the President of the United States “…shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…” (Article II, Section 3 of The Constitution of the United States of America).

Why seek to implement new laws when you do not take care to faithfully execute the current laws?

Copyright © 2007 WorldViewPoints

No Hypocrisy Here–Let Them Finish The Job!

No Hypocrisy Here–Let Them Finish The Job!

[Hypocrisy/Hypocrite; the false assumption of an appearance of virtue…, an actor or pretender of virtue and fairness.]

Support our troops; http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/27/audio-ranger-gets-emotional-about-the-war/

Liberal World Viewers, So Called US Leaders and Mainstream Media–You Hypocrites: “Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.” Luke 6:42

Support Our Troops Now, Stop The Hypocrisy

Hillary Clinton: Statement of Pure Evil—“A Woman’s Right to Choose…”

Hillary Clinton: Statement of Pure Evil—“A Woman’s Right to Choose…”

4/18/2007-Hillary Clinton: From the Senate: Statement on Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. Carhart Decision; Washington, DC — “This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman’s right to choose and recognized the importance of women’s health. Today’s decision blatantly defies the Court’s recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.” http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1451

A Statement of Pure Evil—A Woman’s Right to Choose (to Kill their Baby)—addition added by this writer.

This is pure evil; how can a mother say that the rights and lives of women must be taken into account over the partial-birth abortion of a baby? What about the rights of fathers? Partial-birth abortion is one of the most evil and barbaric voluntary acts committed by humans.

[See excerpts quoted below from the Supreme Court Decision-and you be the judge]

Erosion of what constitutional rights?—you do not have a constitutional right to kill your baby? Maybe Hillary Clinton can show us where in the U.S Constitution it gives women the right to kill their baby.

Just because, in the past, there was an evil decision made by fallible Supreme Court Judges (mere men and women) does not mean that the U.S Constitution gives women the right to kill their baby.

Hillary Clinton, and any other human being, must have a “conscience seared with a hot iron” to really believe that killing a baby by choice is a constitutional right. This is merely “lies in hypocrisy” by a liberal politician seeking power.

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;” “Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” (1Timothy 4:1-2)

Now, you be the judge!

The following statements are quotes from the Supreme Court Decision: Gonzales v. Carhart; No. 05-380 April 18, 2007

Decision Excerpts: Abortion Methods

“Abortion methods vary depending to some extent on the preferences of the physician and, of course, on the term of the pregnancy and the resulting stage of the unborn child’s development. Between 85 and 90 percent of the approximately 1.3 million abortions performed each year in the United States take place in the first three months of pregnancy, which is to say in the first trimester.”

“The most common first-trimester abortion method is vacuum aspiration (otherwise known as suction curettage) in which the physician vacuums out the embryonic tissue. Early in this trimester an alternative is to use medication, such as mifepristone (commonly known as RU-486), to terminate the pregnancy.”

“Of the remaining abortions that take place each year, most occur in the second trimester. The surgical procedure referred to as “dilation and evacuation” or “D&E” is the usual abortion method in this trimester.”

“A doctor must first dilate the cervix at least to the extent needed to insert surgical instruments into the uterus and to maneuver them to evacuate the fetus.”

“The resulting amount of dilation is not uniform, and a doctor does not know in advance how an individual patient will respond. In general the longer dilators remain in the cervix, the more it will dilate. Yet the length of time doctors employ osmotic dilators varies. Some may keep dilators in the cervix for two days, while others use dilators for a day or less.”

“After sufficient dilation the surgical operation can commence. The woman is placed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. The doctor, often guided by ultrasound, inserts grasping forceps through the woman’s cervix and into the uterus to grab the fetus. The doctor grips a fetal part with the forceps and pulls it back through the cervix and vagina, continuing to pull even after meeting resistance from the cervix. The friction causes the fetus to tear apart. For example, a leg might be ripped off the fetus as it is pulled through the cervix and out of the woman. The process of evacuating the fetus piece by piece continues until it has been completely removed. A doctor may make 10 to 15 passes with the forceps to evacuate the fetus in its entirety, though sometimes removal is completed with fewer passes. Once the fetus has been evacuated, the placenta and any remaining fetal material are suctioned or scraped out of the uterus. The doctor examines the different parts to ensure the entire fetal body has been removed.”

“Some doctors, especially later in the second trimester, may kill the fetus a day or two before performing the surgical evacuation. They inject digoxin or potassium chloride into the fetus, the umbilical cord, or the amniotic fluid. Fetal demise may cause contractions and make greater dilation possible. Once dead, moreover, the fetus’ body will soften, and its removal will be easier. Other doctors refrain from injecting chemical agents, believing it adds risk with little or no medical benefit.” http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/

You be the judge!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia Tech Massacre-It All Could Have Been Avoided!

Virginia Tech Massacre-It All Could Have Been Avoided!

A case for “behavioral profiling”, but this politically correct society in America does not have the courage to stand up for the truth and what is right. And sadly, it will allow future massacres and killings due to the cowardliness of our so called leaders in America. America, it is time to make “behavioral profiling” judgments that pertain to life and death matters facing this nation.

“Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?” (1Corinthians 6:3)

“Va. Tech Killer Ruled Mentally Ill by Court; Let Go After Hospital Visit”-ABC News: “In December 2005 — more than a year before Monday’s mass shootings — a district court in Montgomery County, Va., ruled that Cho presented “an imminent danger to self or others.” That was the necessary criterion for a detention order, so that Cho, who had been accused of stalking by two female schoolmates, could be evaluated by a state doctor and ordered to undergo outpatient care.” http://abcnews.go.com/US/story

“Cho’s Words, Actions Fit School Shooting Pattern”
“Behavior typically raises concerns long before the shooting starts”-MSNBC: “Based on emerging accounts of his behavior before his deadly attack at Virginia Tech, Cho exhibited three characteristics that the experts say are common among school shooters: He didn’t “just snap” but instead acquired the weapons weeks earlier.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

It All Could Have Been Avoided! And it is not about the gun control smoke screen being tossed about by politically correct liberal politicians and the politically correct liberal media.

A True Washington Political Hypocrite-Dianne Feinstein

A True Washington Political Hypocrite-Dianne Feinstein

“Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has abruptly walked away from her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee after a report linked her votes to the financial well-being of her husband’s companies, which received billions of dollars worth of military construction contracts she approved.” http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/

What will the Liberal WorldView Points be on this matter; President Bush lied? She was against the war before her husband needed those contracts?

While she complains about the War that “Bush got us into” and Halliburton, like a true Washington Political Hypocrite, she is prospering.

“And she is wealthy. In 2005, Roll Call calculated Feinstein’s wealth, including Blum’s assets, at $40 million, up 25 percent from the year before. That made her the ninth wealthiest member of Congress. Feinstein’s latest Public Financial Disclosure Report shows that in 2005 her family earned income of between $500,000 and $5 million from capital gains on URS and Perini stock combined. From CB Richard Ellis, Blum earned between $1.3 million to $4 million. (The report allows for disclosure of dollar amounts within ranges, which accounts for the wide variance.)”

“In December 2005, Perini publicly identified one of its main business competitors as Halliburton. The company attributed its growing profitability, in large part, to its Halliburton-like military construction contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the company warned investors that if Congress slammed the brakes on war and occupation in the Middle East, Perini’s stock could plummet.” http://www.metroactive.com/

Sounds like a True Washington Political Hypocrite, to me.

It is time for The corrupt Washington Political Hypocrites to stop playing with the lives of the American people! The State of California needs to stand up and recall this apparently “alleged” corrupt politician–Californians deserve better. We the people of the United States of America need to stand up say to all of the corrupt Washington Political Hypocrites, on the left and on the right, STOP we deserve better. If you cannot be honest and true in how you conduct yourself as a leader WE do not want or need you.

The credibility of the corrupt Washington Political Hypocrites, on the left and on the right, is worth less than two cents and that is the sad state of affairs for this great nation.

But not to despair, for these are the latter times.

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” (1 Timothy 4:1-2)

“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” (2Peter 2:19)

You see, the real problem must be that the corrupt Washington Political Hypocrites do not know JESUS CHRIST, as their LORD and Saviour. What other WorldViewPoints can there be for their conduct?

Copyright © 2007 WorldViewPoints